Leadership Development Programs and Relations

Question: Discuss about the Leadership Development Programs and Relations. Answer: Introduction: Using traditional methods to solve sustainability challenges in this globe has borne no fruits, and therefore it's high time both developed and developing nations start embracing systems thinking to address these challenges which shortly may cause many problems to development issues. Systems thinking is a concept that makes proper use of tools, habits, and ideas to develop the wanted understanding of the interdependent components of complex systems(Nguyen and Bosch, 2013, p.110). By understanding the complex system, one stands a better chance of coming up with a better solution to solve the challenges in question. Sustainability challenges, on the other hand, refers to obstacles that prevent equilibrium approach to economic or business related activities and societal benefit. Increasing women's participation in senior executive roles in Australia Corporation will be more suited in explaining how systems thinking can be used to solve sustainability challenges that face Australian corp orations as increasing the number of women in various companies is a wicked problem. Systems thinking analyses all the components of a system and make it easier to understand. By understanding the elements of the problem, the people charged with coming up with the solutions will find it simpler to develop a solution or solve the problem (Best and Holmes, 2010, p. 150). This will, therefore, help the organization or the society to fix their problems and be able to achieve their goals which may include sustainable development. The purpose of this essay will be to show how systems thinking can be used to solve or develop solutions to sustainability challenges. Further, this essay will demonstrate how using systems thinking can be used to establish solutions to critical sustainability challenges. Systems thinking help in exploring and integrating new ideas in the organization. These ideas lead to new business opportunities which help the firm to grow regarding a larger market share, more revenues, and even profits. The new ideas also help the organization to be more competitive than before as they may create a competitive advantage which makes the firm be able to compete globally with other established companies by either opening branches in other countries or embracing e-commerce technologies (Branson, 2011, p. 793). The new ideas also may involve with coming with new ways of packaging or even rebranding their products and services so as to attract more customers and even position their products in a higher position than those of their competitors. System thinking creates a more appealing vision of the organizational future. By having a well-defined concept, the corporation will have a clear goal and objectives to achieve, and this will mean that greater portion of the organization's resources will be directed towards the achievement of that well-set goal and objectives (Clarke, 2011, p. 500). This will help the firm to avoid wasting resources on some projects or goals which will not help the organization to achieve its future vision and mission. Hence, systems thinking contribute to give teams direction, and this helps them to be focused with less or no wastage of resources towards mean fewer goals and objectives. Systems thinking help to design new systems, and this contributes to creating innovative structures and systems of performing activities with more ease (Flood, 2010, p. 26). This helps in reducing resource consumption in the organization and even less workforce, and these saved resources can get used elsewhere to create more useful products and services which can be used to eliminate some challenges to sustainability in our society such as high prices due to strong demand for goods and services and less supply. It also helps in re-designing broken systems. Since systems thinking enables organizations to understand all components that make up the system, it becomes of greater use when needed to fix a broken system and restore its operations and even re-design it so that it can be more useful than before, and this helps to keep the organization in better condition for tackling its activities which contribute to come up with solutions to sustainability challenges in our nations (Mingers and White, 2010, p.1150). Helps organizations to deal with problems that are associated with change. Change is inevitable in many organizations and for them to be able to cope well with the unexpected changes which may be caused by the modification of legal regulations, tax rates, economic changes, the death of employees and even employee turnover they need to use systems thinking techniques(Mingers and White, 2010, p. 1150 ). This helps organizations survive and address the challenges that hinder their operations and prevent them from developing critical solutions to sustainability challenges which are facing many nations and preventing them from achieving their economic goals which in most cases include poverty alienation. Systems thinking provide a better way of learning new things and processes more quickly. This is because its rules are not complicated and they are straightforward and consistent as they don't change.They are the same from one system to another and even from organization to organization (Best and Holmes, 2010, p.150). This makes them easy to use, and this helps firms come up with critical or valuable solutions that can contribute to solving the problem of sustainability challenges in our country, and this would help to develop sustainable developments that are vital in making our lives better. Also, systems thinking provides a better and new way of making superior decisions and create strategies that help to solve problems and look for leverage points which can contribute to change the issue in question without forgetting about their goals and objectives (Jackson,2010, p.13). This ability makes them be able to help in coming up with solutions that will assist in solving sustainability challenges and also fulfilling their core missions that include creating value, making more profits and increasing shareholders value. Even though in agree that systems thinking help to solve sustainability challenges in our societies, I must agree that it also has some drawbacks which cannot be ignored. For the systems to work efficiently, it requires significant amount of investment in terms of organizational structures and the needed skills as people need to be trained in a series of interrelated topics so that the systems thinking can provide any meaningful solutions in tackling sustainability challenges which are dragging behind our economy (Goh, Brown, Spickett, 2010, p.307). This means that the organisations will have to divert some resources which could have been used to achieve firm's objectives and goals in this systems thinking and it is not a guarantee that the systems thinking will help to come up with the needed solution and this creates fear in some institutions and that is why some organisations are reluctant in embracing the systems thinking approaches. Systems thinking is also very comprehensive and complicated as it provides many alternatives and options but it does not give details of how to achieve the given choices hence the users of the systems thinking approach are forced to look for the ways of making those options on their own, and that's why many corporations ignore it as a way that can help to come up with critical solutions to sustainability challenges that are hindering sustainability development in our nation (Flood, 2010,p.180). Increasing women's participation in senior executive roles in Australian corporation as the wicked problem is going to show us how systems thinking can be used to solve this sustainability challenge in our corporations which may be in one way or another be preventing many Australian companies from achieving their goal. Through the use of systems thinking approach one will be able to avoid this wicked problem of denying women senior positions in many corporations by realizing that women have changed (Branson, 2011, p.793). This implies that many women nowadays have shifted much of their time from domestic roles to labor which can be paid and this has helped them to gain experience and characteristics which are needed so as to survive in a job environment which is dominated by men. This systems thinking approach will make many employers realize that women also has what it takes to succeed and thus helping to solve sustainability challenges in this nation. Through systems thinking many corporations will realize that leadership role have changed and they don't need men only to head and lead them like before. This shift in leadership roles has created an environment which is more conducive and consistent with the female roles in leadership, and this trend will lead to many corporations being used to female gender occupying top seats (Branson,2011, p.793). Systems thinking will also make companies change their organizational practices and avoid discriminating women because they have the same rights as their male counterparts. Through this, many women will be able to assume top seats in some corporation as there will be no discrimination and if it will be detected , courts in Australia are fighting day and night to make sure every citizen who faces employment discrimination gets his/her rights and this protection allows women to access leadership positions in this organisations and ended up doing pretty well in helping solve many global issues affecting our economy (Clarke, 2011, p. 500) . Change in organizational practices recognized by systems thinking has also embraced rewarding hardworking employees regardless of gender, and this has helped many women get promotions and assume top positions in many corporations (Davidson and Burke, 2011, p.280). Systems thinking has also caused Australian company to embrace to advocate for equal emp loyment opportunities actively, and this has caused many women to apply for senior executive roles in many organizations, and many ends up securing the advertised jobs and this has helped to come up with relevant solutions such as empowering women economically and this can solve some sustainability challenges. Embracing systems thinking will also enable corporations to realize that culture has changed in Australia and this progressive change has become of much importance to women who have skills and knowledge to run companies like men. Unlike the past where women with unique talents were not appreciated, nowadays systems thinking embraced in many organisations has helped women with individual talents to be recognized and this recognition has helped many women to access opportunities which have exposed them to business practices which have enabled them to gain the necessary experience needed to run big firms in Australia (Clarke, 2011, p. 500) Rewarding women in executive positions who excel in their roles will also encourage other women to feel motivated to apply for top-level jobs in Australian corporation. In conclusion, systems thinking should be embraced by all corporations. The adoption of systems thinking in organizations operations has proved to help firms understand themselves better. This understanding makes them come up with better decisions that enable them to effectively and efficiently advocate for solutions that will contribute to eliminating sustainability challenges that cripple our economy if not well addressed. References Best, A. and Holmes, B., 2010. Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evidence Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(2), pp.145-159. Branson, D.M., 2011. Initiatives to place women on corporate boards of directors: a global snapshot. J. Corp. L., 37, p.793. Clarke, M., 2011. Advancing women's careers through leadership development programs. Employee Relations, 33(5), pp.498-515. Davidson, M.J. and Burke, R.J. eds., 2011. Women in management worldwide (Vol. 2). Aldershot: Gower. Flood, R.L., 2010. The relationship of systems thinkingto action research. Systemic Practice Galbreath, J., 2011. Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management Organization, 17(01), pp.17-38. Goh, Y.M., Brown, H., and Spickett, J., 2010. Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture. Safety Science, 48(3), pp.302-309. Jackson, M.C., 2010. Reflections on the development and contribution of critical systems thinking and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(2), pp.133-139. Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M., 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), pp.59-68. Mai, T.V., 2010, August. Systems thinking approach as a unique tool for sustainable tourism development: A case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve of Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2010, Waterloo, Canada (Vol. 54, No. 1). Matsa, D.A. and Miller, A.R., 2013. A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from Quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), pp.136-69. Mingers, J. and White, L., 2010. A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), pp.1147-1161. Nguyen, N.C. and Bosch, O.J., 2013. Systems thinking the approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(2), pp.104-115. Nguyen, N.C. and Bosch, O.J., 2013. Systems thinking the approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(2), pp.104-115. White, K., Carvalho, T. and Riordan, S., 2011. Gender, power, and managerialism in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), pp.179-188. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., and Redman, C.L., 2011. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), pp.203-218.